|
Hello Reader, Productivity makes a quiet promise: anything can be moved with enough effort. Break it down, schedule it, show up consistently, and it yields. Most of the time the promise even holds. But everyone is carrying at least one thing it can't touch. A relationship that went silent. A version of yourself that didn't happen. A chapter that closed without your signature at the bottom. A wish that things were different, standing right beside the knowledge that they won't be. There's no next action for that. You can't break longing into subtasks. It has no deadline, refuses delegation, and never shows up on a done list. By every measure productivity knows how to take, it's a defect. An open loop that won't close. So we treat it the way we treat every open loop. We try to solve it. And when solving fails, we try to bury it under busyness, which at least has the decency to be measurable. Both moves fail the same way: they treat something that matters as something in the way. This is where productiveness parts company with productivity. If output is the measure, longing is waste. If meaning is the measure, longing is information. It's the plainest evidence you'll ever get of what actually matters to you. You don't get to act on all of it. You still get to let it aim you. Acceptance gets described as giving up, and that's wrong. Acceptance is a reallocation. It moves your effort off what can't receive it and onto what can, while you carry the rest. Not as a task. As a fact. Some loops don't close. You carry them, and carrying them well is its own kind of work, the kind nobody hands you a checkmark for. There are dates on everyone's calendar that belong to the unresolved. When one comes around, effort is the wrong tool, and it's the only one most of us have been trained to reach for. Put the tool down. Let the day be what it is. Then put your hands back on the things that can still be shaped, and shape them with more attention than usual, because you'll remember clearly that time only moves one way. So here's the practice this week: Name one thing you've been trying to solve that isn't solvable. Just name it. Stop billing it as a project. Notice how much effort comes free the moment you do, and then choose where that effort goes next, on purpose. That choosing is what I mean by productiveness. Not doing more. Doing what matters, with the time that actually belongs to you, in the life that actually exists. See you later, P.S. If you're in or around New York City, I'll be at Book Report in Port Washington on Tuesday, September 15 at 7 PM, talking about Productiveness and signing books. The store is one block from the end of the LIRR Port Washington line. Come say hi. |
I’m Mike Vardy, and I help people build a better relationship with time — not by controlling it, but by working with it. Through my writing, courses, and community, I explore how intention and attention shape a more meaningful life — one rooted in the original idea of productiveness over productivity.
Hello Reader, There's a line in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly that gets passed around like folk wisdom: If you work for a living, why do you kill yourself working? It comes out of Tuco's mouth. That matters more than the line itself. Tuco is a bandit. He spends the entire film scheming, running, getting double-crossed, walking across a desert, and coming within an inch of being hanged more than once. Nobody works harder in that movie. Nobody suffers more for what he's chasing. He just...
The Lantern by Mike Vardy Vol. 2, Issue 27 | September 5, 2026 Hello Reader, The calendar is dragging its feet this year. Labour Day always lands on the first Monday of September, and this year that Monday is the 7th. That is as late as it can possibly be. Summer got a two-day extension nobody asked for, and the long weekend that usually kicks off the "real" year is still sitting out there past this Saturday morning. Because let's be honest about what Labour Day actually is. January 1st gets...
Hello Reader, Picture a party, or a conference lobby, or the school pickup line. Someone extends a hand and asks, "Who are you?" Notice what they didn't ask. Nobody asks "What are you?" That question would land strangely, almost rudely. We save "what" for objects. A chair is a what. A person is a who. The grammar assumes there's a someone standing in front of you before there's a something, and it makes that assumption on your behalf every time. So far, so good. Being comes first, right there...