|
Hello Reader, As you continue to refine your productivity practices, I want to introduce a concept that might transform the way you think about your workday: Tolerance. Often, we equate tolerance with enduring less-than-ideal circumstances, but when applied to productivity, it offers a powerful framework for dealing with the natural variability in our work performance and planning accuracy. Tolerance in productivity involves acknowledging and planning for the natural discrepancies in both the quality and quantity of our outputs. This perspective is crucial, especially given our tendencies to underestimate the time required for tasks—a cognitive bias known as the planning fallacy. By recognizing this, we can shift our approach from rigid precision to strategic flexibility. While specific tools (and TimeCrafting itself) can facilitate this approach, the concept of tolerance itself does not rely on any particular software or system. It’s about adjusting our mindset and planning methods to accommodate the expected and unexpected variances in task durations and outcomes. For instance, when setting project timelines or daily schedules, we might consider building in buffers and flexible deadlines that account for these variances. Here are some practical steps to integrate tolerance in our workflow:
When you embrace tolerance in your productivity practices, you’ll aim not just to manage but to strategically use the natural variability in your performance to your advantage. This shift will help you build more resilient and adaptable work processes, ultimately leading to better outcomes and more satisfaction and fulfillment. See you later, PS: In my latest podcast episode, Patrick Rhone and I discuss the choices we make and how cultivating tolerance can profoundly affect our personal and professional lives. Listen (and subscribe) here.. |
I’m Mike Vardy, and I help people build a better relationship with time — not by controlling it, but by working with it. Through my writing, courses, and community, I explore how intention and attention shape a more meaningful life — one rooted in the original idea of productiveness over productivity.
Hello Reader, In 1997, Elliott Smith put out an album called Either/Or. It's quiet and close, mostly one voice and a guitar, and for years I assumed the title was a mood. It wasn't. He borrowed it from a book, Søren Kierkegaard's Either/Or, from 1843. Kierkegaard's book is about two ways of living. One drifts from pleasure to pleasure and never commits to anything. The other chooses, and keeps choosing. His point was that the hard part isn't picking the right side. The hard part is choosing...
The Lantern by Mike Vardy Vol. 2, Issue 34 | October 24th, 2026 Hello Reader, Last week I wrote about watching the Foo Fighters play for three hours, and how nobody in that stadium was counting. I’ve kept thinking about what was powering that set. It wasn’t a schedule. It wasn’t a quota. Whatever kept them going that long came from somewhere deeper than discipline. That question sent me back to the name of this newsletter. When I told you why I called it The Lantern, I talked about carried...
Hello Reader, A line came to me out of the blue last week, after a couple of days that asked more of me than usual: Soft days make for hard landings. Hard days make for soft landings. By "landing" I don't mean the end of the day. I mean the moment something hard shows up. Days that test you are rehearsal. When the next test arrives, you've been somewhere like it before, and the impact gets absorbed. A long run of easy days leaves you out of practice, and the same challenge hits like a drop...